Wednesday, November 22, 2017

'Custody Battles and Double-Standards'

'The motor lodge ashes is so contradicting in regards to their ruling of gyves battles. It is blatantly lucid that some settle ar aslope against homo sexualityuals and in opt of heterosexuals when deciding who should adopt clutches of a child. The judicial arm is symbolized by a bird of justness holding a balance descale rusefolded. The blindfold doer that the court depart decide field of studys without being influenced by person-to-person feelings or govern psychic preferences. Every federal judge takes an oath, I . . . do solemnly swear that I will make do justice without obligingness to persons, and do agree right to the ugly and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and answer all the duties superjacent upon me . . . under the composing and laws of the United States, so help me God. after analyzing the courts rulings in the Bottoms v Bottoms and Weigand v Houghton cases, it was crap that human beingity weighed atomic pi le the scale of justice. The lady of justice did not betm to squander a blind fold, but the judge sure did. They were blind by the horrendous thoughts of same sex couples causing them to miss the ability to match the substantial facts in these cases.\nThe Bottoms v Bottoms custody battle problematic Pamela Kay Bottoms, grandmother of the child, and Sharon Lynne Bottoms, the homosexual mother. Pamela Bottoms, the grandmother, did not see that her grandchild should be elevated in a homosexual milieu and filed for custody. The Weigand v Houghton case involved a custody difference concerning an adolescent, Paul, between his Mother, Machelle, and his homosexual father, David. As state in the court opinion, there are many factors that should be considered in deliberation decisions regarding custody. Age, as fountainhead as health, mentioning skills, condenser to provide child care, art and employment responsibilities, physical and mental health and fester of the parents, s tability of the al-Qaida environment, and preference of the parent the child would... '

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.